2CPU

Main Menu

· Content
· News
· Articles
· Mailinglists
· Knowledgebase
· Trouble Tickets
· Files
· Glossary
· Links
· Compatibility Lists
· Forums

News

· News Overview
· News Channels
· News Archive
· Search News
· Submit News

What's New

Login to see an overview of all news stories since your last visit.

News Channels

· General Site News
· Folding@Home
· SETI@Home
· General Web News
· General Distributed Computing
· RC5
· General Articles
· Hardware
· Motherboards
· Video Cards
· Storage
· Cases
· Optical Drives
· Barebones, Servers and SFFs
· Processors
· General Hardware
· Operating Systems
· Applications
· How-To
· General Technical
· Frequently Asked Questions
· Editorials
· Press Releases

News Tags

The news tag list is currently empty

Online Users

There are currently 17 user(s) online:
Google, MSN

Managed with Contentteller(R) Community Edition, (C) 2002 - 2009 Esselbach Internet Solutions. The Community Edition of Contentteller(R) is free software released under the GNU/GPL v3

Latest News

· Happy New Year
· AMD aim Opteron at the Cloud
· Cisco doing the silicon shuffle
· Juniper goes after the SDN market
· China gives birth to Godson, rival Intel
· HP intros the Proliant SL4500 series Server
· Tech Jobs and Minimum wage
· Linux Mag's Linux for Small Business Servers
· AMD's Sweet 16
· AMD Aiming for ARM

Top News

· Samsung To Enter the Server Market?
· Weekend Topic: Should employers be able to fire employees caught looking for job
· Neoseeker plays with Iwill's DVD266-R!
· Site Redesign: Comments? Suggestions? Help?
· Poll Time: Milkshake - Beverage or Dessert?
· Help Wanted!
· Honesty: The best policy?
· Dual AMD with nForce?
· AMD says 'No' to dual Athlon XP's?
· Multimonitor graphics shootout at TR

Latest Poll

There are currently no polls in the news database

News Archive

· January 2013
· December 2012
· November 2012
· October 2012
· August 2012
· July 2012
· June 2012
· May 2012
· April 2012
· March 2012
· February 2012
· January 2012
· December 2011
· November 2011
· April 2011
· March 2011
· February 2011
· January 2011
· November 2010
· October 2010
· September 2010
· August 2010
· July 2010
· June 2010
· May 2010
· April 2010
· March 2010
· February 2010
· January 2010
· December 2009
· September 2009
· August 2009
· July 2009
· June 2009
· May 2009
· April 2009
· March 2009
· February 2009
· January 2009
· December 2008
· November 2008
· October 2008
· September 2008
· August 2008
· July 2008
· June 2008
· May 2008
· April 2008
· March 2008
· February 2008
· January 2008
· December 2007
· November 2007
· October 2007
· September 2007
· August 2007
· July 2007
· June 2007
· May 2007
· April 2007
· March 2007
· February 2007
· January 2007
· December 2006
· November 2006
· October 2006
· September 2006
· August 2006
· July 2006
· June 2006
· May 2006
· April 2006
· March 2006
· February 2006
· January 2006
· December 2005
· November 2005
· October 2005
· September 2005
· August 2005
· July 2005
· June 2005
· May 2005
· April 2005
· March 2005
· February 2005
· January 2005
· December 2004
· November 2004
· October 2004
· September 2004
· August 2004
· July 2004
· June 2004
· May 2004
· April 2004
· March 2004
· February 2004
· January 2004
· December 2003
· November 2003
· October 2003
· September 2003
· August 2003
· July 2003
· June 2003
· May 2003
· April 2003
· March 2003
· February 2003
· January 2003
· December 2002
· November 2002
· October 2002
· September 2002
· August 2002
· July 2002
· June 2002
· May 2002
· April 2002
· March 2002
· February 2002
· January 2002
· December 2001
· November 2001
· October 2001
· September 2001
· August 2001
· July 2001
· June 2001
· May 2001
· April 2001
· March 2001
· February 2001
· January 2001
· December 2000
· November 2000
· October 2000
· September 2000
· August 2000
· July 2000
· June 2000
· May 2000
· April 2000
· March 2000
· February 2000
· January 2000

Theme Selector

The theme override option is disabled

Welcome to our website

To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.

2CPU.com » News » June 2005 » 64-bit Celeron! Woo.

64-bit Celeron! Woo.

Posted by: duke on: 06/28/2005 02:40 PM [ Print | 12 comment(s) ]

C|Net has reported that Intel has officially released its 64-bit version of the Celeron processor.
Intel's new Celeron D 351 is the heir-apparent to the current Celeron D S775 processor series. The two chips are nearly identical, apart from the addition of 64-bit processing technology, which Intel calls EM64T.
Why am I posting this? While most of us probably don't use Celerons in our own machines, I'm sure many of you opt for the Celeron in machines built for family members. I know I do. You can read the remainder of the report over here.


Digg it! Slashdot Del.icio.us Technorati Fark it! Binklist Furl Newsvine Windows Live Netscape Google Bookmarks Reddit! LinkaGoGo Tailrank Wink Dzone Simpy Spurl Yahoo! MyWeb NetVouz RawSugar Smarking Scuttle Magnolia BlogMarks Nowpublic FeedMeLinks Wists Onlywire Connotia Shadows Co.mments

Related Stories

03/23/2005 03:45 PM: 64-bit Computing @ Tech-Report by duke
Scott over at Tech-Report has put together an article discussing 64-bit computing. Is it mostly hype or is it for real? 64-bit computing won't bring us two times the performance in an amazing overnigh...

03/04/2004 03:04 PM: Intel will outsell AMD 64-bit chips by year end by Jim
The Inquirer has posted about some comments made by Peter Glaskowski, the chief editor of the Microprocessor report. He seems to think that while Intel is definitely playing catch-up with its 64-bit X...

07/07/2002 12:56 AM: Opteron and Itanium: Two Roads to 64-bit Computing by Jim
Ace's Hardware has another interesting article up, this time dealing with AMD's Opteron and Intel's Itanium. Two companies with a different philosophy with respect to 64-bit computing. However, in the...


« What is the Best Firewall for Servers? · 64-bit Celeron! Woo. · Mac Switch Series: Mad as Hell »

Comment

terminalrecluse
is home now


Posts: 3802
Joined: 2004-08-07

#37076 Posted on: 06/28/2005 08:53 PM
Who in their right mind buys a Celeron anymore?

121 total Ghz, 304GB in total memory... Arch Linux - stable : 3930k @ 4.4Ghz, 64GB DDR3, 120GB Samsung 840, HX850 DAS - Norco 4020 - 20x Seagate 3TB, 1KW PSU FBSD 10 ZFS server - SM Chassis, SM X8DTE, 2x L5520 Xeons, 48GB Reg DDR3 ULP, IBM 5015 w/ 512MB DDR2 cache, RAID-50 - 42TB storage Dell C6100 - 4 nodes, 2 1.1KW psu's, 2x L5520s, 6x e5530s, 192GB reg DDR3 (48GB each), F@H, etc

Comment

Jim_
Administrator



Posts: 3464
Joined: 2000-03-15

#37077 Posted on: 06/28/2005 09:04 PM
While I haven't bought a Celeron in awhile, I've put them in the machines of family members and friends for years. Alicia's computer runs on a 1.7GHz Celeron. My father's machine as well. Hell, my Dell PowerEdge server has a Celeron in it.

They may not have a lot of horsepower in relation to the other processors that are available, but they're still more than adequate for the majority of desktop tasks.

[url="http://www.2cpu.com"][size=1]2CPU.com[/url] - Because two are always better than one! [url="http://www.jimkirk.org"]jimkirk.org[/url] - Not a Myth any Longer. Just a Dad.[/size]

Comment

terminalrecluse
is home now


Posts: 3802
Joined: 2004-08-07

#37078 Posted on: 06/28/2005 10:19 PM
I guess they have their uses. The good thing about a 64bit Celeron is that it forced AMD to release a 64bit Sempron. And I hear they overclock pretty well.

121 total Ghz, 304GB in total memory... Arch Linux - stable : 3930k @ 4.4Ghz, 64GB DDR3, 120GB Samsung 840, HX850 DAS - Norco 4020 - 20x Seagate 3TB, 1KW PSU FBSD 10 ZFS server - SM Chassis, SM X8DTE, 2x L5520 Xeons, 48GB Reg DDR3 ULP, IBM 5015 w/ 512MB DDR2 cache, RAID-50 - 42TB storage Dell C6100 - 4 nodes, 2 1.1KW psu's, 2x L5520s, 6x e5530s, 192GB reg DDR3 (48GB each), F@H, etc

Comment

Hooz
Administrator



Posts: 2337
Joined: 2000-03-29

#37079 Posted on: 06/29/2005 12:23 AM
I was actually waiting for the 64bit Celeron. I've had a project in mind that would be absolutely perfect for it.

[size=1][url="http://www.2cpu.com"]2CPU.com[/url] - Because two are always better than one! Are you folding? [url="http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_summary.php?s=&t=3074"]2CPU.com Folding@Home Team[/url] [url="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=19979"]My Heatware[/url][/size]

Comment

terminalrecluse
is home now


Posts: 3802
Joined: 2004-08-07

#37080 Posted on: 06/29/2005 04:02 AM
What project? Folding farm?

121 total Ghz, 304GB in total memory... Arch Linux - stable : 3930k @ 4.4Ghz, 64GB DDR3, 120GB Samsung 840, HX850 DAS - Norco 4020 - 20x Seagate 3TB, 1KW PSU FBSD 10 ZFS server - SM Chassis, SM X8DTE, 2x L5520 Xeons, 48GB Reg DDR3 ULP, IBM 5015 w/ 512MB DDR2 cache, RAID-50 - 42TB storage Dell C6100 - 4 nodes, 2 1.1KW psu's, 2x L5520s, 6x e5530s, 192GB reg DDR3 (48GB each), F@H, etc

Comment

Sesshoumaru
Ghost in the System



Posts: 831
Joined: 2004-08-01

#37081 Posted on: 06/29/2005 07:00 AM
HTPC?

Anjel Folding at Home - AMD Turion 64 1.6Ghz @ 2.0Ghz 1.08v

Comment

terminalrecluse
is home now


Posts: 3802
Joined: 2004-08-07

#37082 Posted on: 06/29/2005 07:23 AM
I'm thinking it's an overkill home router.

121 total Ghz, 304GB in total memory... Arch Linux - stable : 3930k @ 4.4Ghz, 64GB DDR3, 120GB Samsung 840, HX850 DAS - Norco 4020 - 20x Seagate 3TB, 1KW PSU FBSD 10 ZFS server - SM Chassis, SM X8DTE, 2x L5520 Xeons, 48GB Reg DDR3 ULP, IBM 5015 w/ 512MB DDR2 cache, RAID-50 - 42TB storage Dell C6100 - 4 nodes, 2 1.1KW psu's, 2x L5520s, 6x e5530s, 192GB reg DDR3 (48GB each), F@H, etc

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#37083 Posted on: 06/29/2005 08:17 AM
You guys are just elitists. I have used machines that are much slower than today's celerons, and they worked fine. Most of the time for a generally decent desktop experience I notice that more ram and faster disks make more of a differance than a fast cpu. I've run a 400Mhz (P2) for a while as a desktop (a year ago) and it was not that terrible (had win2k on it, then fedora 3). It did however have 256mb ram, and a 80GB wd sped edition in it.

Note: Not a main desktop!!! But not so bad that you couldn't use it to look at some photos, listen to some music, and email+web.

Comment

XWRed1
Registered User



Posts: 185
Joined: 2001-08-27

#37084 Posted on: 06/29/2005 12:13 PM
Sempron is socket A isn't it?

How does that work? Can you run 64-bit semprons in older socket A boards then?

Comment

terminalrecluse
is home now


Posts: 3802
Joined: 2004-08-07

#37085 Posted on: 06/29/2005 12:28 PM
Nope. The 64bit versions of the Sempron (the higher end of AMD's low end) are socket 754 with half the cache, 256KB. There are also 32bit versions that are also socket 754. I think they started with the 3100+ Semprons.

121 total Ghz, 304GB in total memory... Arch Linux - stable : 3930k @ 4.4Ghz, 64GB DDR3, 120GB Samsung 840, HX850 DAS - Norco 4020 - 20x Seagate 3TB, 1KW PSU FBSD 10 ZFS server - SM Chassis, SM X8DTE, 2x L5520 Xeons, 48GB Reg DDR3 ULP, IBM 5015 w/ 512MB DDR2 cache, RAID-50 - 42TB storage Dell C6100 - 4 nodes, 2 1.1KW psu's, 2x L5520s, 6x e5530s, 192GB reg DDR3 (48GB each), F@H, etc

Comment

Gand
Noob



Posts: 451
Joined: 2003-03-30

#37086 Posted on: 06/29/2005 06:51 PM
Fastest available Sempron is the 3300+: http://www.monarchcomputer.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=M&Product_Code=120418&Category_Code=amdsempron

Not a 64-bit capable CPU. Wierd thing is the 3100+ has 256k L2, but the 3300+ drops to 128k again. Was the 64-bit Sempron on AMD's roadmap even? Not that I am aware of.

There is no spoon HeatWare: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=16337 Ebay:http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=niftydl

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#37087 Posted on: 06/29/2005 06:54 PM
Originally posted by XWRed1
Sempron is socket A isn't it?

How does that work? Can you run 64-bit semprons in older socket A boards then?


They have both opteron and old school based semprons.


--------------------------

I just built my cousin a machine with one. Not bad at all. Damn old amd cpus are cheap.


I don't totally see why they make stuff like sepron. Just have the 64s and then the old ones. I;d rather have a regular athlon over a celeron anyday.

2CPU.com » News » June 2005 » 64-bit Celeron! Woo.