2CPU

Main Menu

· Content
· News
· Articles
· Mailinglists
· Knowledgebase
· Trouble Tickets
· Files
· Glossary
· Links
· Compatibility Lists
· Forums

News

· News Overview
· News Channels
· News Archive
· Search News
· Submit News

What's New

Login to see an overview of all news stories since your last visit.

News Channels

· General Site News
· Folding@Home
· SETI@Home
· General Web News
· General Distributed Computing
· RC5
· General Articles
· Hardware
· Motherboards
· Video Cards
· Storage
· Cases
· Optical Drives
· Barebones, Servers and SFFs
· Processors
· General Hardware
· Operating Systems
· Applications
· How-To
· General Technical
· Frequently Asked Questions
· Editorials
· Press Releases

News Tags

The news tag list is currently empty

Online Users

There are currently 26 user(s) online

Managed with Contentteller(R) Community Edition, (C) 2002 - 2009 Esselbach Internet Solutions. The Community Edition of Contentteller(R) is free software released under the GNU/GPL v3

Latest News

· Best CPU: 10 top processors from AMD and Intel
· Happy New Year
· AMD aim Opteron at the Cloud
· Cisco doing the silicon shuffle
· Juniper goes after the SDN market
· China gives birth to Godson, rival Intel
· HP intros the Proliant SL4500 series Server
· Tech Jobs and Minimum wage
· Linux Mag's Linux for Small Business Servers
· AMD's Sweet 16

Top News

· Best CPU: 10 top processors from AMD and Intel
· Samsung To Enter the Server Market?
· Weekend Topic: Should employers be able to fire employees caught looking for job
· Site Redesign: Comments? Suggestions? Help?
· Poll Time: Milkshake - Beverage or Dessert?
· Neoseeker plays with Iwill's DVD266-R!
· Help Wanted!
· Honesty: The best policy?
· No comment!
· It's Official: nitro_fish owns me...

Latest Poll

There are currently no polls in the news database

News Archive

· November 2015
· January 2013
· December 2012
· November 2012
· October 2012
· August 2012
· July 2012
· June 2012
· May 2012
· April 2012
· March 2012
· February 2012
· January 2012
· December 2011
· November 2011
· April 2011
· March 2011
· February 2011
· January 2011
· November 2010
· October 2010
· September 2010
· August 2010
· July 2010
· June 2010
· May 2010
· April 2010
· March 2010
· February 2010
· January 2010
· December 2009
· September 2009
· August 2009
· July 2009
· June 2009
· May 2009
· April 2009
· March 2009
· February 2009
· January 2009
· December 2008
· November 2008
· October 2008
· September 2008
· August 2008
· July 2008
· June 2008
· May 2008
· April 2008
· March 2008
· February 2008
· January 2008
· December 2007
· November 2007
· October 2007
· September 2007
· August 2007
· July 2007
· June 2007
· May 2007
· April 2007
· March 2007
· February 2007
· January 2007
· December 2006
· November 2006
· October 2006
· September 2006
· August 2006
· July 2006
· June 2006
· May 2006
· April 2006
· March 2006
· February 2006
· January 2006
· December 2005
· November 2005
· October 2005
· September 2005
· August 2005
· July 2005
· June 2005
· May 2005
· April 2005
· March 2005
· February 2005
· January 2005
· December 2004
· November 2004
· October 2004
· September 2004
· August 2004
· July 2004
· June 2004
· May 2004
· April 2004
· March 2004
· February 2004
· January 2004
· December 2003
· November 2003
· October 2003
· September 2003
· August 2003
· July 2003
· June 2003
· May 2003
· April 2003
· March 2003
· February 2003
· January 2003
· December 2002
· November 2002
· October 2002
· September 2002
· August 2002
· July 2002
· June 2002
· May 2002
· April 2002
· March 2002
· February 2002
· January 2002
· December 2001
· November 2001
· October 2001
· September 2001
· August 2001
· July 2001
· June 2001
· May 2001
· April 2001
· March 2001
· February 2001
· January 2001
· December 2000
· November 2000
· October 2000
· September 2000
· August 2000
· July 2000
· June 2000
· May 2000
· April 2000
· March 2000
· February 2000
· January 2000

Theme Selector

The theme override option is disabled

Welcome to our website

To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.

2CPU.com » News » July 2004 » There's a new ipod in town

There's a new ipod in town

Posted by: BuyALambo on: 07/19/2004 09:15 PM [ Print | 35 comment(s) ]

For those of you that are still trying to find a gift for Jim, you may want to wander over to Apple's site and check out the latest ipod revision.



Digg it! Slashdot Del.icio.us Technorati Fark it! Binklist Furl Newsvine Windows Live Netscape Google Bookmarks Reddit! LinkaGoGo Tailrank Wink Dzone Simpy Spurl Yahoo! MyWeb NetVouz RawSugar Smarking Scuttle Magnolia BlogMarks Nowpublic FeedMeLinks Wists Onlywire Connotia Shadows Co.mments

« Happy Birthday shout out ... · There's a new ipod in town · New SGI supercomputer to scale Linux to 1,024 CPUs »

2 pages 1 2

Comment

Athemeus
SMP Decepticon



Posts: 576
Joined: 2002-03-02

#30720 Posted on: 07/20/2004 02:19 AM
Silly Apple...advertising "Shuffling" as a feature...too bad Nomads have had that since I bought my first one in '02? 20GB for 299!!! And my Zen NX, 6 months ago only had 30GB for $250...

2 x 2.8 Xeons on a PC-DL I am an out of control, hardware junkie.

Comment

sAvAgE69
Unregistered



#30721 Posted on: 07/20/2004 02:31 AM
Remember Mac people are Smarter :D

Comment

Occupant
Registered User


Posts: 2405
Joined: 2002-03-04

#30722 Posted on: 07/20/2004 02:55 AM
Arent Ipod's pretty sad? dont they have a limited bit rate, thus have poorer sound quality than other 3rd party mp3 players?

Comment

plympton
Registered User


Posts: 147
Joined: 2001-06-21

#30723 Posted on: 07/20/2004 03:31 AM
Originally posted by Occupant
Arent Ipod's pretty sad? dont they have a limited bit rate, thus have poorer sound quality than other 3rd party mp3 players?


Um.. no. You're probably thinking about the 128 kbit AAC downloads from the iTunes music store. I'm sure you can have 256 or 320 kbit MP3's if you so desire (and have headphones that can handle that).

I got a good deal on a Gen 2 10 GB one, and it's still going strong. Not sure I'd have paid full price, but for $100, it was worth it!

-Dan

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30724 Posted on: 07/20/2004 05:35 AM
Crap, I just bought one a week ago Damn it damn it damn it. I like it though.

Comment

LRSeriesIII
Aspiring Rocket Scientist



Posts: 1120
Joined: 2002-08-29

#30725 Posted on: 07/20/2004 05:46 AM
Originally posted by Mr. Hahn
Crap, I just bought one a week ago Damn it damn it damn it. I like it though.


Hey, it could have been worse. This seems to have been a minor upgrade. (Now if they had made a major price drop...that would have been painful. :p )

->Computers ->Folding for team 3074

Comment

plympton
Registered User


Posts: 147
Joined: 2001-06-21

#30726 Posted on: 07/20/2004 06:52 AM
Originally posted by Mr. Hahn
Crap, I just bought one a week ago Damn it damn it damn it. I like it though.


If you got it from Apple (and a lot of other places) there's like a 7-10 day price protection / exchange policy...

-Dan

Comment

Vericious Knid
I eat oompaloompas


Posts: 32
Joined: 2004-07-08

#30727 Posted on: 07/20/2004 07:07 AM
stereophile review

On page 3 I'll quote the relevant part...

"Things are somewhat better at 128kbps in both MP3 and AAC, but neither cuts the mustard for critical listening at home. MP3 robbed Steve Swallow's pulsing bass lines of dynamics and punch on the Carla Bley album, while blunting the shimmer of the brass overtones. AAC fared slightly better, offering better bass response (although it was still pretty lightweight compared to the original CD) and slightly more extended HF (again, shelved down in comparison to the CD).

Surprisingly, upping the bit rate to 160kbps did not result in major improvements for either format. Bass impact remained MIA in MP3, and the upper frequencies sounded strident, with that unmistakable "too much compression" punchiness. AAC again sounded marginally better, although Bley's big band still seemed flattened and lacking in dynamic variation.

The audiophile in me began to pay attention at 192kbps. Both MP3 and AAC began to exhibit a small degree of soundstaging, albeit not with great amounts of front-to-back dimensionality or layering. MP3's highs began to lose their stridence, and AAC sounded fairly detailed and revealing.

The compressed formats began to show some real promise at 320kbps. Definition, detail, and soundstaging were all impressive, and high-frequency response was almost liquid in its lack of edge effects. At this rate, differences between the two formats jumped into sharper focus: MP3 made transients "splashy," while AAC just sounded anemic compared to the original. With both formats, dynamic variation was considerably reduced compared to the CD.

Best of all

Insert witty sig [here]

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30728 Posted on: 07/20/2004 10:20 AM
Originally posted by plympton
If you got it from Apple (and a lot of other places) there's like a 7-10 day price protection / exchange policy...

-Dan


yeah well it is like the 12th day but I am going to go see what I can do tommorow. bought it from the apple store.

Comment

Saundie
Asthenia


Posts: 96
Joined: 2003-05-04

#30729 Posted on: 07/20/2004 01:28 PM
That looks exactly as I described in my news post back in April.

If only more people read my site :(

Originally posted by Athemeus:

And my Zen NX, 6 months ago only had 30GB for $250..


I got my Zen Xtra 30gb back in February, it cost me

The Americans will always do the right thing... after they have exhausted all the alternatives - Sir Winston Churchill eBay & Heat feedback Phoenix -i7-3960x, 32gb PC3-12800, Asus P9X79 Pro, nVidia GTX 560Ti, 128GB & 256GB Crucial M4

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30730 Posted on: 07/20/2004 01:42 PM
Originally posted by Saundie
That looks exactly as I described in my news post back in April.

If only more people read my site :(



I got my Zen Xtra 30gb back in February, it cost me

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30731 Posted on: 07/20/2004 01:46 PM
Originally posted by plympton
Um.. no. You're probably thinking about the 128 kbit AAC downloads from the iTunes music store. I'm sure you can have 256 or 320 kbit MP3's if you so desire (and have headphones that can handle that).

I got a good deal on a Gen 2 10 GB one, and it's still going strong. Not sure I'd have paid full price, but for $100, it was worth it!

-Dan


Nice deal. I am going to kill some people in an attempt to get the new one w/ 12 hour batery life though. That is the best part of the new one imo. That basically gurantees that you will never run out of bateries in the middle of a trip (longest plane flight I have ever been on was about that much and I have noticed that my ipod goes for a lot longer than spec if I turn off the backlight.

Comment

scheme
SMP user


Posts: 257
Joined: 2002-01-18

#30732 Posted on: 07/20/2004 07:26 PM
Originally posted by Vericious Knid
stereophile review

On page 3 I'll quote the relevant part...
The compressed formats began to show some real promise at 320kbps. Definition, detail, and soundstaging were all impressive, and high-frequency response was almost liquid in its lack of edge effects. At this rate, differences between the two formats jumped into sharper focus: MP3 made transients "splashy," while AAC just sounded anemic compared to the original. With both formats, dynamic variation was considerably reduced compared to the CD.

Best of all

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30733 Posted on: 07/20/2004 08:10 PM
Originally posted by scheme
I would discount most things given in stereophile magazines. They tend to go into some odd theories (e.g. putting green ink on the edge of a cd enhances playbay, oxygen free cables help improve the quality of digital streams, etc). The lack of ABX testing also tends to make things iffy as to whether the differences they are talking about are really there or whether they are psychological artifacts.


Yeah really. One of the writters in sound and vision seems to bash anything that isn't a vinyl record. Digital musics seems to be the thing that pisses him off the most. On my ipod, especially if I have the music ripped at a recent bit rate w/ vbr and a decent set of earphones (I am using the apple in ear head phones which I like more than the stock ones), I really can't hear any real quality differences between the original cds at all. I actually kinda like the look of the previous gen a little more though, not too crazy about the click wheel. I am going to go to the store and fight for the new ones w/ 12 hour batery life today though. I like to go on hiking trips, and sometimes that involves really long flights, so I definetly want something that lasts the longest.

Comment

i_wolf
labhair dom as gaelige


Posts: 2034
Joined: 2002-11-19

#30734 Posted on: 07/20/2004 08:57 PM
I have a zen and originally I would have agreed that the zen sounded better than the ipod.. but with firmware 2.2 it seams that at the very least the sound quality has improved significantly to the point where it is at least as good as the zen ... sometimes if Im honest I think it actually sounds better on the same mp3.
As for the comparison between different codecs, generally speaking I personally find that AAC has a nicer sound at the majority of bitrates to mp3 encoded with LAME. But I would take findings in these magazines with a grain of salt because most of these reviews are based on older versions of these codecs so their results may not be applicable to todays versions. AAC in quicktime has gone through many different revisions over the past. Similarly with LAME.
As a device, I think the ipod is fantastic. It has a lovely user interface, its small, light and sounds great. What it does, it does exceptionally well. It plays music. I don't own one myself, my zen has another 30gig's of space left  ;) but if I was looking for another jukebox today, I would probably go for an ipod.... primarily for a few reasons...
1) One of smallest high capacity players
2) One of the lightest
3) Excellent screen .. much better than my zen's tiny screen
4) Excellent sound quality
5) Lots of additional available peripherals
6) Quick and easy access to music via the scroll wheel. It really is an improvement over the scroller in my Zen. Especially when a device is crammed with music.
7) Battery life is not bad in the new version... not great however. I see the new zen touch has 24 hours of battery and its replacable too!

I guess it depends on what your needs are. Some people might need something like the Archos videa and music player...

Hung like a donkey. Go like a horse!

Comment

ReMeDy
labhair dom as gaelige



Posts: 12389
Joined: 2001-02-10

#30735 Posted on: 07/20/2004 11:54 PM
I am going to kill some people in an attempt to get the new one w/ 12 hour batery life though.


You paid all that money for an "iPod" and it doesn't even have a double digit battery capacity?:confused: People actually praise this product?:confused:


If it isn't zealotry...

|[size=1][url=http://forums.2cpu.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=279831#post279831][color=yellow]FAQ's[/url][/color][/size]|Heatware-Remedy{WcS}|Dual760|Beerology|

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30736 Posted on: 07/21/2004 12:38 AM
Originally posted by ReMeDy
You paid all that money for an "iPod" and it doesn't even have a double digit battery capacity?:confused: People actually praise this product?:confused:


If it isn't zealotry...


Since when was 8 hours bad? It is very compact and has a good interface. All I really want in a device. I want something to integrate well with itunes aswell. I don't think it is perfect, nothing is. But it is a pretty good product imo.

Comment

jives
BP6 User



Posts: 2399
Joined: 2001-05-18

#30737 Posted on: 07/21/2004 01:20 AM
Ok but how long will these "batteries" last?

Wasn't one of the big problems with the ipod the fact that the batteries failed after a year or so and weren't user replaceable?

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30738 Posted on: 07/21/2004 02:47 AM
Originally posted by jives
Ok but how long will these "batteries" last?

Wasn't one of the big problems with the ipod the fact that the batteries failed after a year or so and weren't user replaceable?


Dude that was like the first generation or something. I know someone that had problems. The batteries don't really cease to work at all, the life just decreases quite a bit. Anyways they have a program to replace bateries. I heard it is somewhat resonable.

Comment

ReMeDy
Unregistered



Posts: 12389
Joined: 2001-02-10

#30739 Posted on: 07/21/2004 02:56 AM
Since when was 8 hours bad?


Hmm... The Dell 'DJ' can run up to 16.5 hours on a single charge. Average. The iRiver IHP series can run up to 14.5+ hours on a single charge. The Creative Zen Xtra & Touch are surpassing 11+ hours on a single charge. So yes, 8 hours is pretty bad for a device that is supposed to be the paradigm of 'audiomobility'. And it still cost more than a Zen Xtra that has 30GB capacity and longer running lithium life.

Yet, People pay more for an iPod? :confused:

......


I don't think it is perfect


You can sure say that again...

But it is a pretty good product imo.


For the dollar amount Apple is requesting, it had better be a good product. Or else, what would be the justification of its price(over the alternatives)? Clout?:confused:

|[size=1][url=http://forums.2cpu.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=279831#post279831][color=yellow]FAQ's[/url][/color][/size]|Heatware-Remedy{WcS}|Dual760|Beerology|

Comment

Vericious Knid
I eat oompaloompas


Posts: 32
Joined: 2004-07-08

#30740 Posted on: 07/21/2004 05:50 AM
It is a good product. People tend to be satisfied with it. I'm gonna look around at the win versions, I'm sure for the most part they are good as well.

Insert witty sig [here]

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30741 Posted on: 07/21/2004 06:21 AM
Originally posted by ReMeDy
Hmm... The Dell 'DJ' can run up to 16.5 hours on a single charge. Average. The iRiver IHP series can run up to 14.5+ hours on a single charge. The Creative Zen Xtra & Touch are surpassing 11+ hours on a single charge. So yes, 8 hours is pretty bad for a device that is supposed to be the paradigm of 'audiomobility'. And it still cost more than a Zen Xtra that has 30GB capacity and longer running lithium life.

Yet, People pay more for an iPod? :confused:

......




You can sure say that again...



For the dollar amount Apple is requesting, it had better be a good product. Or else, what would be the justification of its price(over the alternatives)? Clout?:confused:



Most of the ones you mention from what I have seen in stores are either a lot bigger than the ipod, or they use flash media. So of course they should have better batery life, either are bigger than the ipod and should have a bigger better battery or use flash media which greatly improves batery life because there are no moving parts. The battery doesn't have anything to do with how good the ipod is dude, same damn battery. Now I could be wrong, never held a dell dj in my hands but from what I have seen on tv it looks quite a bit bulkier than the ipod. Iriver is just a stupid example to bring up because it uses flash media, it is like comparing apples and oranges.

Comment

Mr. Hahn
Unregistered



#30742 Posted on: 07/21/2004 06:34 AM
As I suspected, dell's is roughtly 7 oz , zen is about 8 oz, and the ipod is roughtly 6 oz. With 12 hours batery life, and such nice integration w/ itunes along with it looking a hell of a lot better (yeah call me superficial, but for a portable devices like that I kinda like it to look cool and be as light as possible) I would go for the ipod. The ipod mini is about 3 to 4 oz believe. Who needs more than 8 - 12 hours of battery? Mine actually goes for a bit more than 8 anyways. I mean a plane flight from atlanta to frankfurt is roughly 9 hours, that is the longest I will ever go w/o a recharge so the battery is not even an issues. Plus belkin makes nice external batery for say, if I wanted to listen to my ipod on the flight to a hiking trip on the moon.

Comment

LRSeriesIII
Aspiring Rocket Scientist



Posts: 1120
Joined: 2002-08-29

#30743 Posted on: 07/21/2004 07:30 AM
Originally posted by Mr. Hahn
yeah call me superficial, but for a portable devices like that I kinda like it to look cool and be as light as possible

For the price of any of those music players, they had better look good. They should make you happy you bought it when you look at it. To me, looking at a product and feeling like I got my money's worth is one of the most important factors. In the case of something like the iPod, that means having nice aesthetics. (And this is coming from a guy who thinks computer cases that are not beige are too extravagant.)

If I was in the market for a portable media player right now, I would definitely go with the iPod. Two major reasons: 1.) I love iTunes. :) 2.) The overall look and feel of the iPod is supposed to be second to none. This is what I have seen in every review. (Well, the reviews talk about the feel, I can judge the look on my own.) The aesthetics, ergonomics, and interface of the iPod just seem to be a cut above everything else. The gap is really closing, but it still seems to be there.

That said, I thought about buying an iPod not long ago, but not yet...too many other cool things, not enough money. :p

->Computers ->Folding for team 3074

Comment

ReMeDy
Aspiring Rocket Scientist



Posts: 12389
Joined: 2001-02-10

#30744 Posted on: 07/21/2004 08:17 AM
Iriver is just a stupid example to bring up because it uses flash media, it is like comparing apples and oranges.


Yawn...Do you even do your research before making paradoxical statement(s)?

" * Plays over 600 hours of digital music*
* Up to 16 hours of battery life
* Supports MP3, WMA, ASF, WAV and OGG music files
* Ultra-fast USB 2.0 transfers (up to 40 times faster than USB 1.0)
* Integrated FM tuner
* Backlit remote control with 4-line display
* Built-in voice recorder
* Intuitive music navigation
* Real-time MP3 encoding (no PC required)
* 20GB of internal storage
* Store or transfer files of any type
* Extra-large, 8-line, backlit LCD
* Rechargeable Lithium Polymer battery
* Optical input and output
* Upgradeable to future formats and features "

All that in 5.1 oz


dell's is roughtly 7 oz , zen is about 8 oz, and the ipod is roughtly 6 oz


You can actually denote weight differential of 7,6, and 8 ounces? It weighs 2 ounces less and that is being regarded as a positive grade for purchasing? You must be a supernatural. :^) The average box of Kraft Macaroni & Cheese from a local grocer is 8oz. So will this mean the end of lifting a box of Mac & cheese to cook because Tofu weight less? :^) :^)

For reference, I looked up that battery from belkin that you mentioned. Its weight is 7oz. 7+6(ipod) is 13oz. Move over Macaroni, audio obesity is here. Thy name, !p0d. :^)


Who needs more than 8 - 12 hours of battery?


Worst case scenario;

Geek rides public transportation to work. Bus, Train and then a short walk to job location. One way. Total duration o home tof work destination; 88 minutes. An hour and a half if you will. Average 3G iPod lithium life, 7.5 hours. 88 minute trip to work. You now have 6 hours left of play time. Average work day: 8 hours + a lunch break. 30 minutes. Geek decides to bee bop to iPod for fraction of his work day while working(courrier). (Motivation) 2.5 hours of playtime subtracted from the pod now. Battery level hovering around 4 hours. End of the day, geek now punches out of work and begins commute home. (88m). Hunger strikes geek, now geek is craving for food and beverage. A quick pit stop to Subway/Papa Ginos for slice of nourishment. 30 minute supper, now heads on homeward. Now you're down to 3.5 hours of time. Geek boards transportation. Subtract 88 minutes from the batt. Now you're down to 2 hours left.

Moral of the story, Had the public transportation took a fault between stops, Bye bye iPut.

Was the dollar amount spent worth every penny? Maybe, maybe not.

I didn't come to attack you Mr. Hahn. But what irritates me most about the iPodeaots, they seem bash every other HD Mp3 player when it's announced. (They haven't even hit stores yet and already predicting doom). But yet, when the iPod has a know flaw like amp not being upto par with the Zen, the minuses becomes ignored. Sweep it under the rug, point the finger at the competition to justify the purchase of 399 or 499 for 3G iPod.

Giving a failing grade to a product because of its few millimeters of its leading competeting product is pretty assinine.

Hmmm, a few mm larger in volume with a larger capacity HD, a long running batt., and a superior amp to the phones. Not to mention almost $99+ cheaper than the leading product and it becomes excluded from a purchase of because of the size is a few mm larger?

I just can't see the logic...

|[size=1][url=http://forums.2cpu.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=279831#post279831][color=yellow]FAQ's[/url][/color][/size]|Heatware-Remedy{WcS}|Dual760|Beerology|

2 pages 1 2

2CPU.com » News » July 2004 » There's a new ipod in town